Author Archives: Michèle Nuijten

Top Downloaded Paper

Posted on by

I am very happy to announced that my paper “Practical tools and strategies for researchers to increase replicability” was listed as a Top Download for the journal Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.

The paper lists an overview of concrete actions researchers can undertake to improve the openness, replicability, and overall robustness of their work.

I hope that the high number of downloads indicate that many researchers were able to cherry-pick open practices that worked for their situation.

Read the full paper (open access) here.

wiley_certificate

METAxDATA Meeting at QUEST, Berlin

Posted on by

Last month, the QUEST center in Berlin organized the first METAxDATA meeting on building automated screening tools for data-driven meta-research. On the first night of the meeting, 13 researchers gave lightning talks about their tools. The clip below features my <2 minute lightning talk about statcheck.

All lightning talks were recorded and can be found here.

Nature Comment: Rule Out Conflicts of Interest in Psychology Awards

Posted on by

nature

In a comment in Nature that came out today, we address the potential problem of conflicts of interest in psychology awards. We went over the websites of 58 psychological societies, and found that the large majority did not mention any conflict of interest policy with respect to awards. This means we can’t rule out the possibility that recipients of the awards may be closely affiliated with the award committee (e.g., a supervisor selecting his/her PhD student for an award). We urge societies to be open about their award procedures, to avoid the impression of hidden nepotism.

We thank everyone who helped us coding the websites at the 2019 SIPS meeting.

Read the Nature comment here.

Read the working paper here.

 

Guest at “KennisCafé: De Foute Avond”

Posted on by

Yesterday, I was part of the discussion panel at the “KennisCafé: De Foute Avond”. The KennisCafé is a monthly night at de Balie, Amsterdam, where scientists and other experts discuss a certain topic for a laymen’s audience. This night, the theme was: problems and mistakes in science.

Together with panel members Lotty Hooft (director Cochrane Netherlands), Lex Bouter (professor in scientific integrity and methodology), and Paul Iske (“Chief Failure Officer”), I discussed topics such as statistical mistakes, problems with replication, and possible directions for solutions.

The livestream (in Dutch) can be found here:

The KennisCafé is a production of NEMO Science Museum, KNAW, de Volkskrant, and de Balie. More information can be found here.

Teacher of the Year

Posted on by

I am proud and happy to announce that I was elected Teacher of the Year of Tilburg University.

In teaching, I hold on to a famous Dutch saying: “beter goed gejat, dan slecht bedacht”, or “it’s better to steal something good, than to come up with something bad”. There are so many smart people coming up with innovative, educational tips, tricks, and tools, that it doesn’t make sense (to me) to try and reinvent the wheel.

I’m always trying to improve my teaching and my courses, and I’m incredibly thankful that my students seem to notice that 🙂

teacheroftheyear

Tilburg University Dissertation Prize

Posted on by

Yesterday I was awarded the Tilburg University Dissertation Prize. It is a great honor, but I’m especially grateful because this as a sign that Tilburg University thinks it is good to be critical about the current scientific system, and that open science is an important step forward.

I would like to thank my advisors and collaborators, without whom this dissertation would not exist.

My full dissertation, “Research on Research: A Meta-Scientific Study of Problems and Solutions in Psychological Science”, can be downloaded here.

dissertationprize

In the Chronicle: The Open Science Movement is Cooperative, not Destructive

Posted on by

In a recent letter to the editor in the Chronicle, we reply to an earlier article that

presented the open science movement as “burning things to the ground”. We disagreed. We mainly see cooperative, constructive, and pragmatic initiatives to improve the state of psychological science.

download

Read the full letter here.

Chartier, C. R., Kline, M. E., McCarthy, R. J., Nuijten, M. B., Dunleavy, D. J., & Ledgerwood, A. A cooperative revolution in psychology. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Open Software for Open Science

Posted on by

At the Solid Science Workshop in Bordeaux (September 6-7, 2018), I gave a workshop about free software to facilitate solid research practices. During this workshop, we collaboratively worked on a list of resources/software/tools that can be used to improve different stages of the research process.

Check out the list, share it with colleagues, or add your own resources to it here: https://bit.ly/opensciencesoftware.

The slides of the workshop can be found here: https://osf.io/s8wpz/.

empcycle